News/Updates 

       

All Roads Lead to This

With the switch from the Charger R/T to the Charger Daytona, I had my work cut out for me to build an accurate movie car. Both Revell and AMT make models of the '69 Charger Daytona, and I could have used Revell's version to keep it "in the family" with the other Fast and Furious Chargers, but I had an AMT kit on the shelf and wanted to try it out. I have built a version of this kit before, so it wasn't totally unfamiliar territory, but this was a whole different animal:



Building and Rebuilding

A quick recap for those just joining: late in 2013, a scale modeler who goes by the name Chevy Cheeseburger issued a challenge to his audience: locate an unbuilt version of the first model you had ever assembled, and do it again to see how far you've come as a builder. It sounded like a fun idea, though to be honest I can't remember which kit was my first. It was likely either an AMT '32 Vicky from my parents, a Bburago Mercedes Gullwing from my sister, or a 1/16 MPC '63 Corvette from an aunt. But the Vicky has long since been recycled, the Gullwing wouldn't show much progress since it was a screw-together diecast kit, and the Corvette has been shifted to "collectible" since my focus narrowed to ~1/24 scale only.

However, there was another kit from that time in my life that I do remember as being a "first." Another aunt had given me an AMT '59 Corvette, and it became my first ever attempt at customizing and detailing a model. "Customizing" meant a belly pan, an engine swap, and several of the optional parts from the kit. "Detailing" meant ignition wires, battery cables, and a fuel line. The results weren't very pretty: the belly pan was paper, the engine sat so high that I couldn't get the hood on it, the wires were held in place with great gobs of glue, parting seams and broken connection points were everywhere, and the "paint" was either Glosscote or Dullcote over bare plastic, with some very rough brush work for the details. In other words, this seemed like the perfect candidate for a rebuild and comparison:



It was a fun project, and although it's no show-winner I'm happy with the results.

RoboCop Review

So...RoboCop. When I first saw the trailers for it, I knew right away what a huge mistake it was going to be. They decided to remake one of the pillars of science fiction, one of the most brilliant pieces of cinematic satire, and one of the most violent films of all time as a PG-13 summer movie. Robocop himself looks like he's wearing a leftover costume from Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy, and the rest of the movie seems to have been visually based on a video game cut scene. Then I saw it. I was wrong.

Continue reading "RoboCop Review"

Dusty Crophopper Addendum

In my review of the Disney Store exclusive Dusty Crophopper, I mention how scaling is a problem. It's the same problem that exists any time aircraft and automobiles need to coexist: planes are big. Really big. Take a large production car—say, a 1957 Imperial at 20.4' (6.2m) long and 6.8' (2m) wide—and you could still fit half a dozen of them in the same footprint needed for a single Cessna 172 (27' (8.28 m) long with a 36' (11.00 m) wingspan). Having a VW Beetle go up against an F-15 just isn't a contest without fudging some of the numbers.

Disney had the same problem with Planes. Early in the movie, we're introduced to some of Dusty's friends, including a forklift and a tanker truck:

Disney Planes movie still


Later on, we see him next to some other cars:

Disney Planes movie still


If this story was told in our world, Dusty should absolutely dwarf these other characters. In the world of Planes, however, they all need to be around the same size...both for storyboarding reasons (it's really hard to block out a scene between a mouse and a great dane), and to make Dusty appear more sympathetic (he's not much of an underdog if he could literally squash everyone else in the scene with him).

You get a slightly more realistic scene when Dusty is talking to the Jolly Wrenches aboard the USS Flysenhower:

Disney Planes movie still


Ignore the giant forklift, and notice how Dusty is much smaller than the fighter jets. The more realistic sizes makes sense here: Dusty is looking up to these guys, both literally and figuratively. But when he's daydreaming about flying with them, suddenly they're all about the same size:

Disney Planes movie still


No, Dusty isn't just really far ahead of them. Look at their shadows on the cloud below them: Dusty's tail is just about even with the noses on the fighter jets.

Unlike Transformers, where the characters are supposed to exactly match objects in our world, vehicles in Cars and Planes are just inspired by our vehicles. Which means that as fans we have a lot of flexibility deciding what's truly "accurate." With that in mind, I'm happy to consider the Disney Store talking Planes figures to be in-scale with the 1/24 Cars vehicles that we have seen so far:

Disney Store Exclusive Dusty Crophopper with Mattel 1/24 Lightning McQueen